1/17/2024 0 Comments Topaz Video AI for ipod downloadPerformance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio and iMac. Mac Studio systems tested with an attached 5K display. Topaz Video AI 3.2.0 tested by performing a 2x upscale on a 45-second 1920x800 H.264 video file.Testing conducted by Apple in April and May 2023 using preproduction Mac Studio systems with Apple M2 Ultra, 24-core CPU, 76-core GPU, and 192GB of RAM, preproduction Mac Studio systems with Apple M2 Max, 12-core CPU, 38-core GPU, and 96GB of RAM, production Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Ultra, 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, and 128GB of RAM, and production Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Max, 10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, and 64GB of RAM as well as production 3.6GHz 10-core Intel Core i9-based 27-inch iMac systems with Radeon Pro 5700 XT graphics with 16GB of GDDR6, and 128GB of RAM.Anyways, lots of benchmarks will be revealed. I won't be getting the fully spec'd out model either. I was looking a the fine print to that and it seems its comparison is to the imac which is strange since i rather see the performance from prior m1 chips. I picked up an openbox Mac Studio base model too so you can see those results too.Īrtemis 1X: 07.07 fps 2X: 05.11 fps 4X: 01.18 fps In Topaz there wasn't a difference in speed between the base and upgraded model and the CPU was slightly out performing the M1 Pro/Max 10 Core anyway so didn't think it was worth the extra money. Gaia 1X: 2.70 fps 2X: 1.66 fps 4X: 1.36 fpsĤX Slowmo Apollo: 7.01 fps Chronos: 2.66 fps Chronos Fast: 4.69 fps Learn different elements of the app and best practices for how to use them. Dive into the details of various functions and features of Topaz Video AI. How to Install Sharpen AI as a Photoshop Plugin. Proteus 1X: 10.40 fps 2X: 6.43 fps 4X: 2.15 fps Sharpen AI 4.0 or 4.1 Model Download is Slow or Not Working. Here's my 16" M2 Max (14" is quite a bit slower due to the lower TDP on the system)Īrtemis 1X: 11.28 fps 2X: 6.78 fps 4X: 2.41 fps Gaia 1X: 4.87 fps 2X: 3.16 fps 4X: 2.34 fpsĤX Slowmo Apollo: 8.48 fps Chronos: 4.12 fps Chronos Fast: 6.11 fps Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1Īrtemis 1X: 13.02 fps 2X: 7.74 fps 4X: 2.87 fps The M2 Max 38 core is right there with the 48 core model. The Ultra is clearly faster than the other M1 variants now. There's been quite a few changes since my post last year. The technology is 100% good but the interface is assumning too much situations, and not let to avoid a lot of problems.Here you go. Those are my thoughts after maybe 4000 videos processed. Because maybe the picture is clean… but with deinterlacing artifacts, or maybe is well upscaled, but the aspect ratio is not the right and the picture is squeezed. If we mix concepts, 50% of times the results are not improving the original. The deinterlace have to be only deinterlace) I think the problem is the interface should show different stepsġ, input pixel aspect (if not 50% of times we are defforming)Ģ deinterlace (independent of enhancing method. If we have to deinterlace and upscale a video with grain we have to use Dione alghoryhtm that is so bad with the grain… And if we selet proteus or Artemis, the upscale is ok and the degrain is ok, but the deinterlace is destroying the results You are assuming that any video have one problem.īut 90% times the videos have a lot of problems. I want to explain better the issue with the deinterlace.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |